Why Values Matter
Over the last 40 years there has been a steady decline in accepted standards of behavior, as "anything goes" has become "everything goes". In step with this decline in actual behavior has been a closing of the collective mind to the idea of standards. Indeed, modern political correctness demands that we be tolerant of anyone except an advocate for strict moral standards, who is dismissed as judgmental.
The long-term effects to society of such thinking are now becoming clear, as outlined by Amy Wax in an excellent op-ed piece in today's Wall Street Journal. (wsj.com for subscribers) Out-of-wedlock birthrates among women with no more than high-school education are soaring while the rates for college graduates remains quite low. Divorce rates are climbing among the unskilled but falling among the well-off. Why the difference? Ms. Wax explains (ellipsis added):
"The well-heeled don't defend the 1950s, but they haven't left them entirely behind...Foresight and capacity for self-governance are qualities that make for economic success. They also make orderly families."
The biggest difference between family life for the well-off and for the unskilled is the behavior of men, says Ms. Wax. Less educated men have adopted infidelity as a way of life; better-educated men often honor monogamy and strive for sexual fidelity. The result is stable families, with better-balanced and ultimately more successful children. Low-income women have few such men from which to pick, yet still want to have children; thus the rise in out-of wedlock births.
So it turns out that all those pesky rules might be good for you after all. It has been fashionable to bash the strict rules and supposed moral high-handedness of the past, and I certainly wouldn't want to return to the stuffy formality of those times. But those rules were not without value: everyone more or less knew his or her role in society and the family, and the higher expectations of the times led in many cases to higher performance, at least for many men in the role of husband and father. Now, there are no rules, and far too many men--and sadly, mostly unskilled and poor men--are taking advantage of that to shirk all responsibility. This is the unfortunate result of the long-lasting tolerance crusade.
So, have contemporary leaders recognized these issues and backed off of the attacks on moral conscience? Listen to Ms. Wax:
"Opinion leaders, meanwhile, continue to tout irresponsible sexual behavior as a mere lifestyle choice and disparage firm standards of conduct. They embrace a misplaced "tolerance" that sees family forms as equivalent and refuses to condemn variants as dysfunctional. The privileged have weathered the moral confusion and protected their children from the worst."
Yet another variation of "the rich get richer." Those of us who advocate traditional moral values--whether Bible-derived or philosophically-based--often feel lonely, old-fashioned, and slightly outcast. Yet not only is living by moral values the right thing to do, but increasingly evidence from real life supports the notion that some rules are better than no rules. We owe it to our own families to live right and to inspire others through our example to do the same.